A growing number of nurse practitioners are providing primary care in low-income and rural areas where physician supply is low, according to a study led by University of Rochester School of Nursing researchers.
The study, recently released in the Journal of the American Medical Association, examined data trends in 50 states and Washington, D.C., from 2010 to 2016, and charted a narrowing gap between the supply of primary care NPs and physicians, particularly in low-income and rural communities.
“The growing NP supply in these areas is offsetting low physician supply and thus may increase primary care capacity in underserved communities,” said Ying Xue, associate professor at the UR School of Nursing and the paper’s lead author.
NPs constitute the largest and fastest growing group of non-physician primary care providers. The number of NPs who provide primary care jumped to 123,316 in 2016, up from 59,442 in 2010. Though primary care physicians outnumber NPs by nearly 2 to 1, studies forecast a shortage of primary care physicians lasting through at least 2025. The shortfall of primary care physicians is seen as particularly severe in rural and other underserved communities.
While previous research has shown that primary care NPs have a higher propensity to practice in low-income and rural areas than primary care physicians, the UR Nursing study is the first to examine the breakdown and distribution of the supply of primary care clinicians in relation to income and population density.
“The demand for care is not exactly the same across areas,” Xue said. “Some areas have high demand and some have low demand. Low-income and rural areas have higher demand and greater health disparities. Increasing the number of primary care clinicians in those areas would help to increase access and help reduce health disparities. That’s the ultimate goal: to have sufficient clinicians to provide care in those areas.”
The study reported that from 2010 to 2016, the average number of NPs in communities with the highest proportion of low-income residents jumped from 19.8 to 41.1 for every 100,000 people, while the average number of physicians dropped from 52.9 to 52 per 100,000 people. In the same time period, the average number of NPs serving rural communities rose from 25.2 to 41.3 for every 100,000 people, while the average number of physicians fell from 59.5 to 47.8.
The larger growth of primary care NPs in low-income areas highlights the opportunity for patients in underserved areas to have more access to primary care. Current evidence suggests that consumers have widely accepted NPs as their primary care provider and that the care provided by NPs is comparable to care provided by physicians.
The study contributes new evidence to a discussion of policy recommendations on the use of NPs in primary care delivery. The findings may spur efforts to develop more effective strategies on NP workforce deployment.
“This paper is really sending a message from a policy perspective about how to more effectively use NPs in primary care delivery,” Xue said. “It may be most beneficial in looking at how to further structure the entire primary care workforce and how to mobilize all primary care clinicians in order to maximize timely access to care for populations in need.”
The study’s co-authors were Joyce Smith, assistant professor of clinical nursing at UR Nursing, and Joanne Spetz, professor and associate director of research at Healthforce Center at the University of California, San Francisco.